The Spark

“The emancipation of the working class will only be achieved by the working class itself.” — Karl Marx

A new attack on Roe v. Wade

Mar 17, 2003

The Senate passed a bill making it a felony for a doctor to perform a dilation and extraction abortion procedure. This procedure is the one used late in the second trimester of a woman's pregnancy, and is ordinarily performed only when the risks of continuing the pregnancy are greater than those of carrying out this procedure, since it entails some risk to the woman.

These medical risks are not, however, what prompted the vote. Once again, the reactionary minority which opposes abortion continues to chip away at the supposedly fundamental right to abortion which the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade acknowledged in 1973. Calling this procedure "partial birth" abortion – a medically and scientifically incorrect name – the opponents attempt to portray women who undergo abortion and the doctors who carry it out as murderers.

Prior to January 22, l973, when the Supreme Court issued its Roe v. Wade decision, abortions were illegal in two-thirds of the states, and even in those states where they were legal, they were hemmed in by many restrictions.

Of course, even when abortion was illegal, women with money had access to abortions performed under medically competent circumstances. But for poor women, the home remedies and "back-alley" abortion methods meant danger and even death.

Support for legalizing abortion had been strong before Roe v. Wade – and ever since. A poll in l975 showed that three out of four Americans supported it then. And a recent poll showed an even larger majority – four out of five support women's right to choose an abortion under most circumstances.

Nonetheless, the attacks on abortion rights began almost immediately after Roe v. Wade and have continued ever since. The Hyde Amendment was passed by a Democratic-controlled Congress and signed by Democratic President Carter in l977. It was probably the worst attack because it prohibited using federal funds in Medicaid programs for abortion – in other words, effectively, it denied poor women the right to choose an abortion.

Other attacks included the requirement that the parents of women under 18 years of age be notified before an abortion can be performed; restrictions on what doctors are allowed to tell patients about abortion and contraception; increased waiting periods between the request and the performance of the abortion; prevention of the use of the morning-after pill, mifepristone, up until l995; and even, in some states, the requirement that a woman go to court to request an abortion.

But the attacks have not only been legal ones. In large parts of the majority of states, there is not a single doctor left performing abortions. This problem is the result of a campaign of terror carried out by so-called pro-lifers who have picketed at centers which perform abortions, attacked verbally those entering the centers, and even called on supporters to "eliminate" doctors who perform abortions. Doctors and other medical staff have been murdered.

It is the reactionary nature of the past time period that allowed all those attacks – legal and extra legal – to continue. As the social movements of the l960s and l970s began to quiet down, a number of politicians encouraged the growth of a Christian fundamentalist movement, using it as a base of political support.

Of course such politicians are not limited to the United States. They are simply the U.S. version of the fundamentalism widespread in other countries; they differ little in attitude from Islamic fundamentalists in the Middle East or from Hindu fundamentalists in India or Jewish fundamentalists in Israel in their attitudes toward women and the right to abortion.

If women are to defend themselves and maintain the right to choose abortion (including for poor women who effectively are denied it today), it will be by the same means women gained this right over three decades ago. The right to legal abortion was not given by the Supreme Court 30 years ago – it was granted because women had demanded and fought for it. The decision was partially a result of the women's movement, and it was part of the larger demand for more democratic rights which had existed over a 20-year period prior to l973.

The battle to get rid of Jim Crow by the black population, the numerous protests against the war in Viet Nam and the women's movement all created a climate in which a number of rights were expanded, including the laws for better health care which resulted in Medicare and Medicaid. New laws were passed against discrimination in the work place, in transportation and in housing.

It was in this context that women fought for and won the right to abortion. It is such a situation we have to begin creating again by our struggles.