Last Updated: Feb 27, 2006
Search This Site
Issue no. 769
Editorial
Editorial: Civil war in Iraq: Made in the USA
Pages 2-3
Mardi Gras amid the corpses in New Orleans
Michigan State: Proposed budget is an empty gesture
Corporations – whining about taxes
Taking workers’ concessions, delivering them to shareholders
Criminal co-conspirators: Oil bosses and the politicians
Maryland state: Utilities – no limit to their greed!
Pages 4-5
Afghanistan: A state on emergency life support . . . and under occupation
Italy: “Rape is less severe . . . when the woman isn’t a virgin” – so say five male judges
Poland: A mother blinded by reactionary religion and the rule of money
United States: Oppose the attempt of a reactionary religious minority to outlaw abortion!
United States: Who could possibly object to a vaccine that would save lives?
Mexican coal mining disaster: Company halts rescue efforts with coal miners trapped inside
Pages 6-7
California prison riots: A result of deteriorating conditions – in prisons and outside
Page 8
Open attacks by former officials multiply against the Bush administration
Taking workers’ concessions, delivering them to shareholders
Feb 27, 2006
Chrysler CEO Tom LaSorda told the media that he expects to take from Chrysler workers and retirees the same concessions on wages and healthcare that were taken from Ford and GM workers.
While he is saying this, the DaimlerChrysler Group (DCX) is reporting its profits and dividends for the year.
Reported profits rose half a billion dollars to $3.4 billion. That works out to “earnings per share” of $3.32.
Out of those profits, DCX will give $1.78 per share to shareholders. In other words, more than half of its profits will not be put back into the business. It will be given away as a windfall to holders like Brandes Investment Partners, Deutsche Bank, or JP Morgan Chase – holders who do nothing but sit on their assets all year long and wait for the money to roll in.
DCX’s report actually states that the dividend “takes account . . . also of our expectations for the coming years.”
If their expectations for the coming years are so rosy that they can afford to give away more than half of their net earnings – why do workers have to give away anything at all?




