Last Updated: May 12, 2003
Search This Site
Issue no. 703
Editorial
Editorial: Tax cuts - for the wealthy. Bush's latest war on working people
Pages 2-3
Breaking their own laws to hide what they did to the troops
Smallpox vaccine: Kill a few, scare 'em all
A "War Hero" who never got near battle
U.S. Foreign policy: Blood for money
Pages 4-5
Great Britain: Blair disavowed by his own voters
Argentina: Brukman workers kicked out of factory they ran
Israel-Palestine: Where's the "road map" going?
The "profits" in occupying Iraq
Iraq: The price of "liberation"
Pages 6-7
The government's war on education
L.A. hospital cuts: A new round of attack on workers and poor
Attacking affirmative action to uphold the privileges of the wealthy
Six Easy Pieces: A new Easy Rawlins book
American Airlines: From nearly bankrupt to nearly prosperous in just over a week!
Page 8
Smallpox vaccine:
Kill a few, scare 'em all
May 12, 2003
Part of the government's so-called "war on terror" has been to convince us that we are at risk from terrorists having biological weapons like smallpox.
Since smallpox was wiped out worldwide, 20 years ago, the only known smallpox is in samples kept in 2 secure research labs. The Bush administration has insisted that health workers should get smallpox vaccinations "just in case" some terrorist may have been holding onto some other samples somewhere for those 20 years.
Health care workers, however, are good at calculating health risks. The vast majority won't accept the vaccinations. The government itself says that 1 in 25,000 vaccinated people will have serious or fatal reactions from the vaccine. This is a high risk all by itself. But so far, out of about 35,000 health-care workers who have taken the vaccinations, 13 cases of serious reaction are already on file. This is much more risky! And four deaths are "under investigation."
From the beginning, the government's campaign has been a propaganda campaign, not a health campaign. It was a campaign to influence the U.S. population not only to accept the invasion of Iraq, but to accept whatever the government does to anyone in the name of the "war on terror."
Any one of us is much more likely to win a multimillion-dollar lottery than to fall victim to a terrorist's smallpox. Why should we trade those odds for one in 25,000, let alone one in 2,692?
This government had no problem accepting a certain number of sure deaths from its vaccinations, not when the campaign could be so useful for manipulating the population at large.
All those workers who refused smallpox vaccinations understood that believing the government was the riskiest thing they could do. They were right.




